FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG

AN UNOBSTRUCTED VIEW FROM THE LEFT

OBSERVING AND REPORTING ON THE CLINTON EMPIRE

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Friday, May 20, 2016

Politicians Don’t Get More Establishment than Hillary Clinton

Armory of the Revolution




Politicians Don’t Get More Establishment than Hillary Clinton

Clinton_Corruption_6_479x750
Not a good thing to be in a year in which the establishment is the target of voters’ wrath.
If there were ever a year in which the people were more anti-establishment than they are in 2016, it would have to have been at the founding of the Republic. Not since 1776 has there been such a wholesale rejection by the people of politics, politicians, the status quo, and those in power over them.
The penultimate outsider has locked up the Republican nomination for president, having defeated a host of establishment candidates.
A septuagenarian socialist has fought the leadership of the Democratic party to a virtual draw.
The anointed crown princess of the Wall Street banks and the corporatist establishment is within a month of being guaranteed the Democratic nomination. Despite the direct support of her cronies in the DNC, the entire Democratic party leadership lined up behind her, a rigged primary system, and having enjoyed a lead of almost 70% in the early polls, Hillary Clinton has been rebuked by a large percentage of rank-and-file Democrats, has seen her unfavorable ratings sky-rocket, and is now losing in popular support among rank-and-file Democrats in national polls.
Media talking heads and political pundits never saw Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders coming.
It has been amusing to watch the parade of pontificators from the establishment being trotted out before the cameras at CNN and MSBNC with their weekly prognostications of the imminent demise of Trump’s campaign and the futility of Bernie’s.
Having had monumentally misread the voters in the primaries, the same political geniuses are now weighing in on the likely match-up between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
We are besieged nightly with computer graphics, pie charts, polls and electoral maps all being read to predict the downfall of Donald Trump. While acknowledging that Hillary Clinton has abysmal favorability ratings, we are quickly told that Trump’s are worse, and are reminded that he is upside down with major constituencies such as women, African Americans, Hispanics, etc.
But none of that analysis explains why Trump is leading with independent voters, and that he is within a few points of Hillary in the media’s own polling.
So what is going on?
There is one question the pollsters do not ask. And it is the defining question in this election cycle.
I am waiting for one of the major polling organizations to pose this simple question: Will you vote for or against the establishment?
I have my own guesstimate how that would be answered by the voting public.
And any competent political strategist would concur. I would be dumbfounded if the establishment were to receive as much as 20% were the question to be scientifically posed!
The reason Trump is not beating Hillary by 80% to 20% is because the public is not focused on the establishment versus anti-establishment issue.
At least Not Yet.
When the Trump campaign focuses the issue on Hillary as the establishment’s darling, any wavering support for her will vanish. My prediction is that Trump will handily defeat Hillary.
As in all campaigns, the candidate at a statistical disadvantage on an issue will try to obfuscate and deflect discussion of the positions that are unpopular with the voters, and attempt to drive media coverage to more favorable topics. Hillary’s team will do all they can to keep the public from paying too close attention to which of the candidates is the establishment’s own.
An immeasurable in the contest is the relative enthusiasm (or rabidness) of Trump and Hillary’s supporters.
While I cannot envisage Hillary’s voters following her through brimstone and broken glass, Trump’s supporters seem willing to march with him through the Gates of Hell.
The pundits and the talking heads may actually be right. Hillary may sweep Trump in November.
But I doubt it.
And if their prior analyses are any indication of their current ones, they are again misreading the situation. And the public.


Author’s Notes:
 I am unaware of any other blog with the Armory’s mission of radicalizing the animal movement. I certainly hope I am not alone, and that there are similar sentiments being expressed by comrades unknown to me.
If you know of other blogs dedicated to animal rights and the defeat of capitalism, please comment with a link.
• Be sure to follow the Armory and share it with your Facebook friends and email contacts, as well as on Twitter, Google, and all other social media platforms. Our influence and effectiveness is dependent upon you!
• Natasha Sainsbury, of Good Karma Graphic Design, has joined Armory of the Revolution as Editor, and is responsible for the transformation of the blog’s appearance. Visit and follow her blog V Kind.
 If you are not already subscribed to the Armory, please do so before you leave.
There’s a button to Follow us in the upper right sidebar.
• Be sure to visit Armory of the Revolution’s new commissary and bookstore: The Supply Depot
You will find recommended reading on Animal Rights, revolutionary theory, politics, economics, religion, science, and atheism. There is also a section of supplies for animal liberationists, hunt saboteurs, and social revolutionaries. This is all brand new, and we will be adding lots more merchandise in the near future!
• Feel free to comment. I encourage open discussion and welcome other opinions. I moderate comments because this blog has been attacked by hunters and right wing trolls. I approve comments that are critical as well as those which agree with me. Comments that I will not tolerate are those that are spam, threatening, disrespectful, or which promote animal abuse and cruelty

No comments:

Post a Comment